Why Do We Use Parliamentary Procedure?


Parliamentary Procedures are based on several principles:

1. Perhaps the most important is the principle of rights. 2. There is also the principle of—one thing at a time. 3. There is the principle of germaneness. 4. The principle of balance finds its way into the procedures in some rules. 5. Last, but not least, is the principle of parliamentary courtesy.

   These principles sometimes come in conflict with one another and are sometimes abstract. Therefore, the purpose of rules is to bring a procedural balance that considers all principles and establishes a specific process by which those principles interact and work. In other words, the rules represent principles. Both give specific guidance on method to provide a reasonable compromise in the event of conflict.

    Regardless of a person’s perception of the principles, the rules must be allowed to govern conduct. These rules are not always specific enough in certain instances; as a result, people may disagree about their application. For that reason, members of an organization must agree to follow a certain set of rules, such as Robert’s Rules of Order, or establish more specific rules within the Constitution and By-Laws or some other official manual. In parliamentary rules, as with law, the specific shall take priority over the general. Having an established set of procedures precludes members from claiming that rules do not apply in certain situations because they seem, in their interests, to violate the principles of parliamentary law. Once these rules and procedures have been agreed upon and established by an organization, they are to be followed by the letter. Traditions and customs may change over time. This may necessitate tweaking of rules and procedures in the future.

  by Sean Higgins, Grand Counselor, 2005-07